As the core carrier for optical signal transmission, optical fibers have been widely used in communications, lighting, industrial sensing and other fields. Based on differences in core materials, they are mainly divided into two categories: Plastic Optical Fiber (POF) and Glass Optical Fiber (GOF). The two differ significantly in performance parameters and applicable scenarios. Mastering their differences accurately is the key to scientific selection — this article will conduct a multi-dimensional comparative analysis to provide references for selection.
I. Core Material and Structural Differences: Fundamental Distinctions in Performance Origins
Material is the core root of the performance differentiation between the two. The molecular structure and physical properties of different base materials directly lead to essential differences in the structural form and basic performance of optical fibers.
Plastic optical fibers use polymers as their core material. The mainstream core adopts polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA, commonly known as acrylic glass), and the cladding uses low-refractive-index polymers such as fluororesin. Its most prominent feature is the large core diameter design (0.2-2mm for conventional models, up to several millimeters for special models). However, the loose arrangement of polymer molecules causes scattering loss during optical signal transmission.
Glass optical fibers use high-purity silica glass (SiO₂) as the core material, with a purity usually as high as 99.999% or more, and the cladding is low-refractive-index silica glass doped with trace impurities. Its core feature is the small core diameter design: the core diameter of single-mode fiber (SMF) is only 9-10μm, and that of multi-mode fiber (MMF) is only 50-62.5μm. The dense and orderly arrangement of silica glass atoms can effectively reduce optical signal scattering and ensure transmission stability.
II. Key Performance Comparison: Competition in Transmission and Environmental Adaptability
Performance differences are the core basis for the differentiation of their application scenarios. The following will conduct a systematic comparison from three core dimensions: transmission characteristics, mechanical properties, and environmental adaptability.
1. Transmission Characteristics: Core Differences in Bandwidth and Loss
Transmission loss and bandwidth are the core indicators to measure the transmission capability of optical fibers, and the two show distinct differences in these two key parameters.
The core advantages of glass optical fibers lie in low loss and high bandwidth: the transmission loss of single-mode glass optical fibers at the 1550nm mainstream communication window is only 0.2dB/km, and that of multi-mode glass optical fibers at the 850nm window can also be controlled at 2-3dB/km; the bandwidth performance is also outstanding — the bandwidth of single-mode fiber can reach hundreds of GHz·km, and OM5-grade multi-mode fiber can also reach more than 3000MHz·km, which fully meets the transmission requirements of high rate and long distance.
The transmission performance of plastic optical fibers is relatively limited: the loss of PMMA material at the 650nm visible light window is about 100-200dB/km, and even the improved perfluorinated plastic optical fiber (PFPOF) requires 10-20dB/km; in terms of bandwidth, ordinary PMMA optical fibers only have tens to hundreds of MHz·km, and perfluorinated fibers can be increased to several GHz·km, but they are still far lower than glass optical fibers. This characteristic determines that plastic optical fibers are only suitable for short-distance transmission within 100 meters, while glass optical fibers can achieve repeaterless transmission of several kilometers to hundreds of kilometers.
2. Mechanical Properties: Distinct Contrast Between Flexibility and Strength
In terms of mechanical properties, the two show a significant contrast between “flexible and easy to bend” and “hard and brittle”, which directly affects the installation and application scenarios.
Plastic optical fibers have excellent flexibility and impact resistance: the polymer material has a low modulus of elasticity, with a bending radius as small as several millimeters (some products support a bending radius of 0-5mm), and it is not easy to break even after repeated bending; its impact strength is 10-20 times that of glass optical fibers, so no excessive protection is needed during transportation and installation, and it can withstand a certain tensile force.
Glass optical fibers, however, are hard and brittle with poor flexibility: the minimum bending radius of silica glass is usually 10-20 times the core diameter (for example, single-mode fiber is generally not less than 10mm), and excessive bending or collision can easily cause core breakage; its impact strength is low, so special tools and protective sleeves must be used during installation to avoid external damage.
3. Environmental Adaptability: Scenario Adaptability in Temperature and Corrosion Resistance
Different application scenarios have great differences in temperature, humidity and chemical environment. The two show different focuses in environmental adaptability, which directly determines their applicability in extreme scenarios.
Glass optical fibers have better high-temperature resistance and corrosion resistance: silica glass has a melting point as high as 1700℃ or more, and the long-term service temperature range is stable at -60℃ to 85℃, and special models can withstand extreme temperatures of -40℃ to 125℃; it has extremely strong resistance to chemical media such as acids, alkalis and organic solvents, and can be stably used in harsh environments such as industrial chemical industry and high-temperature furnaces.
Plastic optical fibers have relatively weak high-temperature resistance: the long-term service temperature of ordinary PMMA optical fibers is -40℃ to 60℃, and it is easy to soften and deform when the temperature exceeds 60℃, affecting transmission stability; it has poor resistance to strong acids, strong alkalis and organic solvents (such as alcohol and acetone), and is prone to swelling or degradation. However, in conventional civil environments such as homes and offices, its moisture resistance and aging resistance can fully meet the requirements, and there will be no loss increase caused by water vapor condensation.
III. Application Scenario Differentiation: Demand-Oriented Selection Logic
Based on the above performance differences, the two have formed clear application scenario boundaries. Selection must be centered on actual needs to exert optimal value in corresponding fields.
1. Glass Optical Fiber: Core Choice for Long-Distance and High-Speed Scenarios
With the advantages of low loss and high bandwidth, glass optical fibers have become the first choice for long-distance and high-speed transmission scenarios: in telecom backbone networks, single-mode fibers support inter-city and cross-border optical cable backbone transmission, realizing high-speed data transmission of more than 100Gbps; in data centers, OM3/OM4/OM5-grade multi-mode fibers are used for short-distance high-speed interconnection between servers and switches, meeting the bandwidth requirements of cloud computing and big data processing; in scenarios such as medical endoscope imaging and high-temperature environment monitoring, their ability to withstand extreme environments also occupies a core position.
2. Plastic Optical Fiber: Cost-Effective Choice for Short-Distance and Easy-Installation Scenarios
With the advantages of good flexibility, low cost and easy installation, plastic optical fibers have obvious advantages in short-distance scenarios: in the automotive field, they are used for multimedia transmission such as car audio and navigation, and can withstand vibration and bending during driving; in home intelligent wiring, they are used for short-distance connections between set-top boxes and TVs, routers and terminals, and can be terminated with ordinary tools without professional equipment; in the field of decorative lighting, PMMA optical fibers are widely used in scenarios such as starry sky ceilings, fiber optic light strings and landscape lighting due to their easy shaping and soft light effect; in scenarios such as short-distance interconnection of industrial control and educational experiments, their high cost-effectiveness and convenience are also favored.
IV. Cost and Installation: Key Considerations for Practical Application
In addition to performance and scenario matching, cost control and installation convenience are also key practical factors in the selection process.
In terms of cost, plastic optical fibers have obvious advantages: the cost of polymer raw materials such as PMMA is much lower than that of high-purity silica glass, and simple processes such as extrusion molding are adopted, so the finished product price is only 1/3 to 1/5 of that of glass optical fibers under the same specification; glass optical fibers need to go through complex processes such as high-purity raw material purification and precision wire drawing, especially single-mode fibers, whose production cost remains high.
In terms of installation, plastic optical fibers are more convenient: the large core diameter feature greatly reduces the coupling difficulty with light sources and connectors, and no high-precision alignment equipment is needed — termination can be completed with ordinary tools; glass optical fibers require coupling precision up to the micrometer level due to their small core diameter, so special fusion splicers and testing equipment must be equipped, and high technical requirements are imposed on operators, resulting in a significant increase in installation costs.
V. Conclusion: Core Principle of Demand-Oriented Selection
Plastic optical fibers and glass optical fibers are not a “competition between advantages and disadvantages”, but a “choice adapted to scenarios”. The core selection principle is “demand matching”: if long-distance transmission over 100 meters, high-speed transmission over 1Gbps, or application in extreme environments such as high temperature and strong corrosion is required, glass optical fibers are the inevitable choice; if it is for short-distance transmission within 100 meters, decorative lighting, civil wiring and other scenarios, and flexibility, low cost and easy installation are pursued, plastic optical fibers have more advantages.
In practical applications, the two can form complementary synergy: for example, in smart building scenarios, glass optical fibers are used for inter-building backbone transmission networks, and plastic optical fibers are used for indoor terminal branch wiring, jointly building an efficient and economical optical transmission system.
For customized plastic optical fiber products adapted to scenarios, click to view: https://www.dspof.com/product-category/pmma-fiber-optic-light/
